ContinueWe use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website; if you continue without changing your settings - or dismiss this message - we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on

The Conference Forum

Return to front page

Newest article: Re: George Michael by PaulioToday 08:32Today at 08:32:27view thread

Oldest article: We're on our way by Kingfield Ender'30/9 15:42Sat Sep 30 15:42:43 2017view thread


Next thread: Strictly by slack14/10 20:27Sat Oct 14 20:27:07 2017view thread

Re: Bad news, GC

By Slim Jim12/10 15:29Thu Oct 12 15:29:13 2017In response to Re: Bad news, GC

Views: 611

So a hard working father gets taxed on his income, then when he shuffles off "he" gets taxed again on the residual that he was saving to pass on to his dearly beloved?

My preferred option would be for IHT to be borne by the recipient rather than the estate.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Re: Bad news, GC by Meerkat12/10 15:34Thu Oct 12 15:34:05 2017

Previous thread: FAO of Lee Hughes & Luke McCormick by Sicknote15/10 12:28Sun Oct 15 12:28:18 2017view thread