ContinueWe use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website; if you continue without changing your settings - or dismiss this message - we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on

The Conference Forum

Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Cats,again by MeerkatToday 16:48Today at 16:48:25view thread

Oldest article: Trump #453577888643 by Lord M.Ox3/3 20:29Sat Mar 3 20:29:55 2018view thread


Next thread: Pogba by Oxfordconcrete13/3 21:42Tue Mar 13 21:42:50 2018view thread

Re: Trump part 83777555222

By Jason H - ECFC13/3 15:59Tue Mar 13 15:59:27 2018In response to Re: Trump part 83777555222

Views: 270

Case dismissed.

The "You're an idiot" jibe was in answer to another post, in any case. And, to take a forensic approach, this would have to be to establish a pattern of behaviour that would determine that I am "a person of low intelligence".

Sure, I cocked up in seeing a headline that said "the" investigation was closed and surmised, incorrectly that this was the Mueller investigation rather than the House Intelligence Committee investigation, but one can not extrapolate from that to establish that I am therefore "an idiot".

I always ensure I treat people on here with respect, and I expect people I am debating/arguing with to treat me with the same respect. There is a line therefore which I feel has been crossed (heck, even Farney has hinted at this!).

If Sweepy has the decency to apologise for this jibe, all fine and dandy - I have a lot of respect for him as a poster even when he drifts occasionally into hyperbole. However, I do not take kindly to unwarranted insults.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Re: Trump part 83777555222 by Dr. Blacklips Hoffman13/3 17:03Tue Mar 13 17:03:51 2018

Previous thread: The NME by Greek Card7/3 14:03Wed Mar 7 14:03:27 2018view thread