ContinueWe use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website; if you continue without changing your settings - or dismiss this message - we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on

The Conference Forum

Return to front page

Newest article: Re: 893 by Mr Stagger Lee AKA Bwooder.Today 16:40Today at 16:40:51view thread

Oldest article: Trump #453577888643 by Lord M.Ox3/3 20:29Sat Mar 3 20:29:55 2018view thread


Next thread: Pogba by Oxfordconcrete13/3 21:42Tue Mar 13 21:42:50 2018view thread

Re: Trump part 83777555222

By Jason H - ECFC13/3 16:28Tue Mar 13 16:28:01 2018In response to Re: Trump part 83777555222

Views: 241

It's not about choosing whether to be offended, it's puzzlement at the jibe being issued in the first place and wondering why this happened. To then double down and say it's because of something entirely unconnected (and in no way connected to "idiocy") is weirder still.

But hey, I remember you also being pretty disrespectful when I was going through some pretty heavy domestic strife (for the record at the time my wife had some potentially serious health problems while at the same time she was made redundant), so maybe it runs in the family.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Re: Trump part 83777555222 by Bray Ford13/3 16:30Tue Mar 13 16:30:50 2018

Previous thread: The NME by Greek Card7/3 14:03Wed Mar 7 14:03:27 2018view thread