ContinueWe use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website; if you continue without changing your settings - or dismiss this message - we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on

The Conference Forum

Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Cricket.... by SamBeeToday 14:36Today at 14:36:38view thread

Oldest article: Oh dear, what a piece of bad luck by Yeoman4/9 23:47Wed Sep 4 23:47:02 2019view thread


Next thread: Trump pt 9643942187066 by Sweepy19/9 07:08Thu Sep 19 07:08:11 2019view thread

Re: Summary judgement is pretty damning

By Baldman (Baldman)11/9 10:40Wed Sep 11 10:40:44 2019In response to Summary judgement is pretty damning

Views: 1376

Is it? I’m not sure how it establishes jurisdiction really.

Obviously the documents that were produced showed that prorogue was motivated by a desire to stymie scrutiny, but I’m not sure why that is the court’s business.

I think it should be, but I don’t see how they are saying it actually is. *heads off to DAG’s twitter account.*

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Re: Summary judgement is pretty damning by Dougie MacDougall11/9 11:04Wed Sep 11 11:04:25 2019

Previous thread: The European Parliament by Hughesy18/9 13:23Wed Sep 18 13:23:03 2019view thread