07-01-2025, 10:38 PM in response to #86967
07-01-2025, 10:38 PM in response to #86967 08-01-2025, 09:10 AM in response to #86969 Mr Staffordshire Wrote: Sigh. Unwanted, unwarranted & unnecessary homosexual innuendo directed to me from you that I plainly rejected, so being a mong*ben used the word 1st you've continued repeatedly. I used to read Ladders posts and think he was a little harsh towards you but with hindsight I see that Ladders had it bang on. Did you really think I'd tolerate some mong posting videos of the making of exceedingly high glucose drinks I'm unable to try on my Twitter feed? 08-01-2025, 12:09 PM in response to #86995 Kev-YCFC Wrote: Unwanted, unwarranted & unnecessary homosexual innuendo directed to me from you that I plainly rejected, so being a mong*ben used the word 1st you've continued repeatedly. Yet you are entirely comfortable labelling people as nonces and nonce lovers etc. You think a word from Ben might be a bit wrong to use so you thought the best thing to do was use it (more than once) and then say 'Ben used it first'. What a sad and contradictory world yours is. 08-01-2025, 02:18 PM in response to #87012 NWS Wrote: Yet you are entirely comfortable labelling people as nonces and nonce lovers etc. Life itself is a contradiction like, the word doesn't fuss me, I was monged out a few times in Thailand, that much so a local pulled the outside of his eyes gesturing at me laughing, but he'd loaded the bong and it was his shop so fair play, on another day a low sugar can do similar but without any of the fun parts, and you try to stand up and balance with a blood of 2.5mmols without looking pissed and tell me you're not 'monged out'. I'm not consistently making gay slurs and comments to a father of 3, nor have I ever sent videos sound clips and the things the deaf wouldn't appreciate to it either so why I'm supposed to smile at a clip lasting for a few minutes of a fat guy making a sweet sugary chocolatey drink without comment I don't know. While we're doing mongs I do have to say you present as one too. 08-01-2025, 02:41 PM in response to #86995
Did you really think I'd tolerate some mong posting videos of the making of exceedingly high glucose drinks I'm unable to try on my Twitter feed?
My god. I think myself and a few others have been too hard on you, Kevin, in light of this stunning revelation. 08-01-2025, 02:43 PM in response to #87040 Kev-YCFC Wrote: Life itself is a contradiction like, the word doesn't fuss me, I was monged out a few times in Thailand, that much so a local pulled the outside of his eyes gesturing at me laughing, but he'd loaded the bong and it was his shop so fair play, on another day a low sugar can do similar but without any of the fun parts, and you try to stand up and balance with a blood of 2.5mmols without looking pissed and tell me you're not 'monged out'. There's nothing wrong with being gay though? So how is it a slur? You love having your botty slapped by a sweet sugary chocolatey thing. Shirley, that makes up for not being able to have the drink?? Think positive. We are H2H bro 08-01-2025, 03:00 PM in response to #87044 The Rev Rob SBFC Wrote: There's nothing wrong with being gay though? So how is it a slur? You love having your botty slapped by a sweet sugary chocolatey thing. Shirley, that makes up for not being able to have the drink?? Think positive. Oh look, another full bore fcuking mong. Ol' Musky mate you sulk pal? Now he does despise a liberal. 08-01-2025, 03:54 PM in response to #87047 Kev-YCFC Wrote: Oh look, another full bore fcuking mong. Now now Kevin. What Elon needs is people who over share on the internet. People over reliant on it for (LUTON) facts. That ain't moi. Do keep being pompous though, darling. We enjoy it 08-01-2025, 03:56 PM in response to #86995 Kev-YCFC Wrote: Unwanted, unwarranted & unnecessary homosexual innuendo directed to me from you that I plainly rejected, so being a mong*ben used the word 1st you've continued repeatedly. When you are a homophobe - the sexual innuendo is not unwarranted. GET IT??!?! 08-01-2025, 04:13 PM in response to #87052 The Rev Rob SBFC Wrote: When you are a homophobe - the sexual innuendo is not unwarranted. GET IT??!?! I don't in fact fear them so the term is irrelevant, and like the opera, ballet, snail racing & flower arranging it's something other people do that I have no interest in, if it's a binary choice of like and dislike then I dislike as it's an acceptable opposite of a positive feeling, I'd not be up for going in a gay bar to twat one for being gay, nor have I ever felt the need to mock, but if folk are going to keep with the bent innuendo I'll continue to reply as such. Do you get that? |
|