Proportional Representation

[DesCartes]

Well, this is a turn up for the books, but it'll hardly be mentioned on MSM as Gregg Wallace is not involved.

This afternoon, MPs voted 138 to 136 to allow the Elections (PR) Bill to be introduced to the House

This proposal put forward by Lib Dem's Sarah Olney, via the ten-minute rule motion process. Many such proposals do not progress further, and this is very much the first stage, but it is still a significant win.

Bit of a shock for Sir Keith, but North Yorkshire's answer to Barry Bucknell (Google is your friend) must be creaming himself.

[Kev-YCFC]

Well, this is a turn up for the books, but it'll hardly be mentioned on MSM as Gregg Wallace is not involved.

This afternoon, MPs voted 138 to 136 to allow the Elections (PR) Bill to be introduced to the House

This proposal put forward by Lib Dem's Sarah Olney, via the ten-minute rule motion process. Many such proposals doe not progress further, and this is very much the first stage, but it is still a significant win.

Bit of a shock for Sir Keith, but North Yorkshire's answer to Barry Bucknell (Google is your friend) must be creaming himself.

I'd aspire to be more Mousey Thomson* but without mice and church pews to be honest, and I think you'll find it's our Nigel who'll be creaming himself with full fat cows milk.

*Google be your friend.

[Bullsgold]

Well, this is a turn up for the books, but it'll hardly be mentioned on MSM as Gregg Wallace is not involved.

This afternoon, MPs voted 138 to 136 to allow the Elections (PR) Bill to be introduced to the House

This proposal put forward by Lib Dem's Sarah Olney, via the ten-minute rule motion process. Many such proposals do not progress further, and this is very much the first stage, but it is still a significant win.

Bit of a shock for Sir Keith, but North Yorkshire's answer to Barry Bucknell (Google is your friend) must be creaming himself.

Would anything work any better with a shrapnel parliament?

The answer is undoubtedly no.

[DesCartes]

Would anything work any better with a shrapnel parliament?

The answer is undoubtedly no.

No idea what that expression means. If you mean under PR, why 'No'? It has worked fairly well in other countries.

[Bullsgold]

No idea what that expression means. If you mean under PR, why 'No'? It has worked fairly well in other countries.

I just made it up. Well, I suppose someone else has said it because it sounds like something that someone else would say. I just mean fragmented. Scattered. Chunks flying everywhere. Which is what I think would happen. It may not. It might may.

Yes, obviously there's no problem with that. It sounds nice. The thing I was saying is that it won't improve anything. It'll all just be the same.

[Gary Bauress]

The most important part of this story to be aware of is that it won't happen.

[Bullsgold]

The most important part of this story to be aware of is that it won't happen.

The second most important part of this story to be aware of is, if it did happen, it would make absolutely no difference to the lives of the shackled.

[Marked Ox]

The second most important part of this story to be aware of is, if it did happen, it would make absolutely no difference to the lives of the shackled.

Got to feel sorry for the criminals.

[Bullsgold]

Got to feel sorry for the criminals.

Emancipate yourself from mental slavery and then ask them if they can take off the chains.

THEY WON'T.

Won't you help me sing...

NO, FUCK OFF!

[Kev-YCFC]

Emancipate yourself from mental slavery and then ask them if they can take off the chains.

THEY WON'T.

Won't you help me sing...

NO, FUCK OFF!

These songs of freedom.